Business organisations, e. CBI on the other hand, are likely to give alternative sets of data which is more favourable to their point of view. The effects of a decision can be quite different in the long run. For example, suppose you had an essay, which examined the impact of an increase in tax on petrol. After a couple of years people may find alternative ways of driving. When looking at the effect of one outcome, it is worth bearing in mind it is often difficult to isolate other factors. For example, if we were looking at the impact of a rise in interest rates.
3: Assessment and Examinations
The effect would usually reduce consumer spending. However, there are many other factors that can affect consumer spending.
If confidence was high, for example, consumer spending may not fall at all — despite the increase in interest rates. In subjects like economics, history and politics there are usually several different viewpoints.
For example, if we look at the impact of a rise in government spending, a Keynesian might say this will increase growth; a Monetarist, on the other hand, may argue higher spending merely causes crowding out. Therefore, there are two different possibilities. The impact of a devaluation in the currency depends on the state of the economy. If the economy is experiencing inflation and is in a boom, a devaluation could worsen the inflation.
However, in a recession, a devaluation can help boost exports and there is likely to be limited impact on inflation. A recession in France would lead to lower UK exports to France. Here are some of the different ways in which we provide you with feedback:. University regulations state that you may not query a mark awarded on a piece of assessed work, including an examination, on the basis of academic judgement.
You are entitled to approach the module leader or lecturer to discuss your performance in the assessment, but please note what you must do prior to this, as outlined in the previous section. If you believe that the marks for a piece of coursework not an exam in a module run by the Department of Economics have been totalled incorrectly, you are permitted to request an arithmetic check on the paper.
We have the right, after such an arithmetic check, to adjust the mark upwards or downwards. Should you wish to request an arithmetic check of your marks for an assessment not an exam , please complete an Assessed Work Mark Check form, which is available from the useful forms section. You should submit it, together with the marked copy of the assessed work in question, to the UG Office within seven working days of the date the assessment was made available for you to collect. We will then carry out a check of the marks. If no discrepancy is found, you will be advised of this and asked to collect your work.
You will be advised that there is no right to a further check or questioning of marks. Should a discrepancy be discovered, we will calculate the correct mark for the work and adjust this on our systems. You will then be contacted to collect your work, which will have the corrected mark annotated on it.
PhD in Economics | Economics
You must provide a general bibliography at the end of your essay, listing all the works and people you consulted when researching the essay. Do not omit any sources. Correct referencing is important. To quote facts, figures, theories and theorems without accrediting their original source is an academic malpractice as well as being plagiarism. Direct quotations and results must be footnoted stating the author, publication or book, date and page or table number.
If you rework published data or use it as the basis of your own calculations, you must identify the source in the same way. If you paraphrase the arguments or theories of other people you should again acknowledge the source in a footnote.
Footnotes should be listed at the end of your essay, term paper or project. The following are three examples of the form of the footnotes. In practice, you may find that some of the theories you mention have passed into the public domain and appear in any number of textbooks. However, any textbooks you use should be listed in the bibliography at the end of the essay, term paper or project.
The bibliography should include all books and articles referred to in the particular piece of assessed work. Where tables of data are presented the source of the data should be stated at the foot of the table. For further information on Plagiarism, you can refer to the online Plagiarism Tutorial on Moodle. We define plagiarism as a specific form of cheating: the attempt to pass off the theories, inferences, reasoning, computations or work of others as if they were your own.
Work submitted to the University of Warwick for official assessment must be all your own work and any parts that are copied or used from other people or from work you have previously submitted at Warwick or elsewhere must be appropriately acknowledged. Failure to properly acknowledge any copied work is plagiarism and may result in a mark of zero.
A significant amount of unacknowledged copying shall be deemed to constitute prima facie evidence of plagiarism, and in such cases the onus will be on you to establish otherwise. The university uses Turnitin as its plagiarism detector and all submitted work is analysed by Turnitin. The reports indicating the amount of your work that is similar to or taken from other sources is available to the marker, together with a reference to the original source.
Check our Brief Plagiarism Video on the Department's webpage to get familiar with Turnitin reports and similarity scores. Each year a few students step across the line that separates poor scholarship from cheating. The penalties for cheating are severe and when we detect cheating we apply them rigorously. The penalties normally range from a mark of zero on the work concerned to a smaller deduction of marks.
In the most severe cases, your place on the course may be threatened.
How Long Does it Take to Complete an Online Master’s in Economics Degree?
There are also wider implications that can affect your future. If you have cheated in a piece of work, your referee may be unable to provide this assurance. The procedure is described in University Regulation The Department also has its own policy and procedure document used in the investigation of any case of suspected plagiarism. A review of the work will take place, and you will be invited to a meeting to discuss the work and the allegation.
The Director or Deputy Directors of Undergraduate Studies will then make a recommendation to the Head of the Department about whether plagiarism has occurred and the penalty to be exacted. Where the Head of Department decides an offence has occurred and exacts a penalty, there are a number of different types of penalty available to the Department, with a maximum penalty of a mark of zero on the relevant piece of assessed work. In some circumstances, including repeated offences, the Head of Department may report the matter to the Academic Registrar for consideration by an Investigating Committee of the Senate.
If the Committee finds an offence has been committed, it has the power to impose a mark of zero for the entire module unit or some more severe penalty. At each point you have rights of representation and defence which are described in the regulation and departmental procedure. It should also be noted that the Investigating Committee can, and does, refer serious cases of cheating on to the Discipline Committee. The Discipline Committee can impose further penalties, including the termination of your registration at the University. Plagiarism is damaging.
It damages the perpetrator, who does not learn how to be an economist, but learns how to be dishonest. It damages relations between tutors and students, because it generates suspicion. It damages all students when they leave, because the perpetrator will eventually devalue the reputation of a Warwick degree. It damages all academic staff, who have to spend time policing the rules in place of teaching and research. Plagiarism is regularly detected and penalised and the penalties are severe.
Related economics coursework evaluation
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved